For multinational companies venturing into the global resources sector, navigating political risk is a constant challenge. This ever-changing landscape demands a nuanced understanding of new threats and effective mitigation strategies. Let's explore four key questions: How have political risks evolved in the past five years? While traditional concerns like expropriation, political violence, and currency restrictions remain, newer threats have emerged: Empowered local voices : Local communities, regional governments, and NGOs now wield significant influence, potentially disrupting operations through protests, legal challenges, or social license withdrawal. Transnational crime and corruption : Criminal networks and corrupt officials can manipulate governments and undermine investments. Non-traditional competitors : State-owned companies, sovereign wealth funds, and other players can intensify competition, creating additional risk. How has the global economy impacted political risks? ...
The past decade has witnessed an unprecedented rise in economic powerhouses fueled by resource booms and burgeoning exports. One consequence of this surge is the emergence of a potent financial force: Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs). These government-controlled investment giants manage vast reserves, influencing global markets and sparking both intrigue and concern. In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, SWFs' role has intensified. With traditional avenues of return under scrutiny, these funds are strategically navigating a landscape fraught with noncommercial risks: political instability, social unrest, and environmental uncertainties. How can SWFs navigate this perilous terrain and ensure their investments flourish? Transparency: Building Trust in a Murky World Prior to the crisis, SWFs often operated in a shroud of secrecy, fueling anxieties about hidden agendas and opaque motives. This lack of transparency fostered a climate of suspicion, with host countries fearing preda...